Resources |
◎ COVESA Events |
Join/Sign Up |
◎ Join COVESA |
In-Vehicle Payments Group
- 1 General Information
- 2 White Paper - IVP For Modern Vehicles v.1.07:
- 3 2026 Porto IVP Status Update Presentation:
- 4 Meeting Notes
- 4.1 August 26th, 2026
- 4.2 August 12th, 2026
- 4.3 COVESA IVP and VISS Collaboration Update
- 4.4 Jul 15, 2026
- 4.5 Jul 1, 2027 2026
- 4.6 May 20th, 2026
- 4.7 May 9th, 2026
- 4.8 Agenda April 9th, 2026
- 4.9 Mar 25, 2026
- 4.10 Feb 9, 2026
- 4.11 Dec 1, 2025
- 5 Past In-Vehicle Payment (IVP) Workshop Recordings
General Information
Welcome to the COVESA In-Vehicle Payments for Modern Vehicles Group Meeting
Weekly Meeting: Bi-Weekly on Wednesday starting 3/25/2026 (1700 CET, 11:00am ET, 8:00am PT) (zoom link) (See Community Calendar for details) - IMPORTANT - Between March 8th and March 29th of 2026, the US is on DST and Europe is not. This makes the meeting 1 hour later in the US
Slack: https://covesacommunity.slack.com/archives/C062FSND1GU
Google Group: in-vehicle-payments@covesa.global
Chair: Mark Gerban , PAIRPOINT
White Paper - IVP For Modern Vehicles v.1.07:
2026 Porto IVP Status Update Presentation:
Meeting Notes
August 26th, 2026
Thank you to everyone who joined today’s COVESA In-Vehicle Payments call.
The group reviewed the latest progress on the In-Vehicle Payments framework, including ongoing work around authentication, trust, and standardization across the connected vehicle ecosystem. Following COVESA’s recent announcement regarding its exploration with the FIDO Alliance, the group discussed how established authentication approaches could support the broader In-Vehicle Payments framework and help create a more scalable and interoperable model for vehicle commerce.
We also reviewed how components developed for In-Vehicle Payments could potentially be reused across the VISS and broader vehicle-data ecosystem. A modular architecture could allow common trust and authentication capabilities to support additional use cases such as digital license plates, insurance, emergency services, and secure vehicle-data exchange. Further work will now focus on developing the associated flows and integration models.
The group also discussed upcoming COVESA events, including the October 28–29 All Member Meeting in Novi, Michigan, and CES 2027, where there will be further opportunities to present progress around In-Vehicle Payments. Finally, discussions are continuing with GlobalPlatform to explore how the In-Vehicle Payments work may align with its ecosystem and related industry standardization activities. Overall, the initiative continues to gain momentum as we work toward a common, scalable framework for trusted vehicle transactions and connected services.
August 12th, 2026
COVESA IVP and VISS Collaboration Update
The COVESA IVP Working Group is continuing to explore closer collaboration with relevant standards initiatives across the automotive ecosystem. This provides an important opportunity to support greater interoperability, broader industry alignment, and adoption of the work.
Discussions with the COVESA VISS Working Group have also confirmed strong relevance between VISS and the ongoing IVP activities. The groups are exploring how VISS can support IVP use cases and how the related technical work can be aligned.
The next steps will focus on refining this approach, identifying areas for further collaboration, and developing scalable, standards-based solutions for the connected vehicle ecosystem.
Other activities within the group are ongoing.
Jul 15, 2026
Architecture Development
The group continues to develop the IVP architecture, with a focus on trusted vehicle interactions, credential management, authentication, and scalable implementation across different vehicle platforms.
The work is progressing from a high-level concept toward more detailed architectural and process definitions. Future discussions will continue to examine how established identity, authentication, and vehicle-security technologies could support the overall approach.
Applications Beyond Payments
The discussion highlighted that the underlying trust architecture could support a broader range of automotive services in addition to payments.
Potential applications include:
Vehicle and data credentials
Trusted vehicle data
Insurance-related services
Registration and ownership information
Emergency-service use cases
Digital tolling and road-usage services
Other services requiring confidence in a vehicle, device, user, or data source
A key objective is to create a reusable foundation that can support different service providers without requiring the underlying trust model to be redesigned for every use case.
Coordination Across COVESA
The IVP architecture may also be relevant to several related COVESA activities.
Areas discussed included:
Connected Safety: Exploring trusted vehicle and user information for emergency-service scenarios
Vehicle Information Service Specification: Examining how trust mechanisms could help confirm the source and integrity of vehicle data
Android and application-framework activities: Considering how the architecture could align with vehicle application platforms
Cybersecurity: Exploring relationships between the IVP architecture and secure vehicle hardware or software environments
The group will continue coordinating with relevant COVESA teams to identify common requirements and avoid duplicating work.
Vehicle and Verifiable Credentials
The group also discussed wider industry activity involving verifiable credentials for vehicles.
Possible applications include vehicle registration, ownership, insurance, and fraud prevention. The IVP group will continue evaluating how a common vehicle trust model could complement these developments.
Secure Vehicle Environments
Secure elements and trusted execution environments were discussed as technologies that may support trusted automotive services.
Further coordination with COVESA cybersecurity activities will help determine how secure vehicle platforms could support authentication, credential protection, data integrity, and other IVP use cases.
Tracking External Engagement
As the number of related initiatives increases, the group plans to maintain a shared overview of:
Relevant organizations and working groups
Areas of potential alignment
Current engagement status
Key contacts
Agreed next steps
This will help improve coordination and provide visibility across the wider COVESA community.
COVESA All Member Meeting
The group discussed potential contributions to the COVESA All Member Meeting, taking place on 28–29 October 2026 in Novi, Michigan.
Possible activities include:
A discussion on trusted vehicle identity and authentication
A panel involving automotive and standards organizations
A practical workshop focused on architecture, use cases, and next steps
The group will begin developing potential session proposals ahead of the 15 August 2026 submission deadline.
Next Steps
The next activities will include:
Continuing development of the IVP architecture
Preparing additional architectural and interaction flows
Coordinating with other COVESA groups
Expanding the shared engagement tracker
Developing proposals for the COVESA All Member Meeting
The IVP meeting scheduled for 29 July 2026 will not take place. The group will resume its regular meeting schedule in August.
Jul 1, 2027 2026
The COVESA In-Vehicle Payments white paper has been updated to version 1.07.
The latest version includes small updates based on recent industry feedback and expands the discussion around adjacent vehicle-origin use cases beyond payments. These additions help show how the proposed trust architecture can support a broader range of connected vehicle scenarios where vehicle, device, user, and transaction context need to be reliably linked.
The work continues to progress toward a standardized approach that can support OEM adoption across different in-vehicle commerce and connected mobility use cases.
Key focus areas include user authentication, device and network trust, merchant/payment context, and vehicle-origin signals.
Further discussions with relevant standards organizations and ecosystem stakeholders are expected to continue under appropriate confidentiality frameworks where required.
Broader ecosystem engagement is also being explored, including stakeholders involved in automotive connectivity, payments, and connected vehicle services.
Overall, the initiative is making strong progress and is moving from concept development toward practical architecture alignment and implementation planning.
May 20th, 2026
The discussion focused on the continued development of the COVESA In-Vehicle Payments architecture, including FIDO alignment, SIM/eSIM-based trust signals, verifiable credentials, and merchant ecosystem involvement. The following points were highlighted:
1.) The FIDO agreement remains pending. Paul and Mike will follow up to progress the signature process. It was also noted that a potential COVESA/FIDO press release could help add credibility and momentum to the payment discussions once the agreement is in place. The Agentic Protocol, reportedly developed by Google and contributed to FIDO, was also discussed. Mastercard has reportedly co-developed certain elements. This is relevant because trusted devices and trust anchors are likely to play an important role in future agentic and delegated transaction models. FIDO may also explore non-payment use cases, which could broaden the relevance of the COVESA IVP work beyond payments.
2.) From the OEM side, there is interest in using SIM/eSIM memory to retrieve trust signals for payments and potentially other vehicle use cases. Further technical review is required, particularly around memory capacity and integration requirements. The SIM software package discussed for communication with the SIM is estimated at around 44KB in size, with AT commands required for communication with the SIM to create the trust anchor.
3.) If memory becomes a constraint, an additional eSIM could potentially be used, with an estimated market cost of approximately $1 per module. This could offer significant economic advantages compared with non-standard components such as HSMs, which may cost approximately €5–10 per unit.
4.) It was also noted that the SIM does not need to sit in a specific part of the vehicle. As long as AT command capability is available, the relevant SIM/eSIM could sit in different vehicle modules. This may provide greater deployment flexibility compared with a dedicated HSM-based approach.
5.) A separate verifiable credentials project is being discussed with COVESA. Paul will introduce the relevant California-based contacts. The team should consider whether this work can be incorporated into the payment and trust model discussions.
6.) Jim will help coordinate discussions with merchant ecosystem stakeholders, including Conexxus, to ensure merchant and acceptance network requirements are reflected in the evolving architecture, where a COVESA/FIDO press release will be quite helpful.
Owner | Action |
|---|---|
Paul & Mike | Follow up on getting the FIDO agreement signed. |
Paul | Introduce the California-based contacts responsible for the verifiable credentials project. |
Jim | Coordinate discussions with merchant ecosystem stakeholders, including Conexxus. |
IVP team | Review SIM/eSIM memory capacity, AT command requirements, and integration feasibility for payment trust signals. |
IVP team | Clarify where SIM/eSIM trust functionality would sit within the vehicle architecture and how it compares with HSM-based approaches. |
IVP team | Assess whether the verifiable credentials workstream can be incorporated into the payment/trust model. |
IVP team / COVESA / FIDO | Consider a joint COVESA/FIDO press release once the cooperation framework is formalized. |
May 9th, 2026
The group is currently discussing the preferred hardware architecture for vehicle-based payment authentication and trust signaling. The primary focus is whether the industry should standardize around the vehicle SIM as the common trust anchor and token storage mechanism, rather than relying on dedicated HSM implementations.
One of the key considerations raised is scalability and ecosystem consistency. While HSMs provide strong security capabilities, OEMs currently use a wide range of different chipsets and hardware configurations, creating fragmentation and potential interoperability challenges. In contrast, virtually all connected vehicles already include a SIM/eSIM infrastructure, making it a more uniform and broadly deployable foundation for a standardized architecture.
Supply chain resilience was also discussed. Dedicated HSM hardware introduces additional sourcing and supply chain dependencies, whereas SIM-based infrastructure is already mature, globally available, and integrated into existing automotive connectivity stacks. As a result, the group appears to be converging toward SIM-based trust architecture as the more scalable and practical long-term direction for cross-OEM standardization.
The working group now needs to reach formal alignment on whether the SIM should be recommended as the baseline architectural direction within the standard. If consensus is achieved, the next step will be to update the white paper with a formal recommendation reflecting this direction.
In parallel, the group also noted that the cooperation agreement between FIDO Alliance and COVESA still requires signature completion from Steve in order to move the collaboration forward.
Following signature completion of the agreement with FIDO Alliance, the next milestone will be presentation of the proposal to the technical working group for approval on May 25th. The presentation will be led by Mark, Sri, and Jim.
Subject to approval from the technical group, the subsequent phase will involve direct engagement with Visa and Mastercard, alongside discussions with FIDO Alliance, to present the proposed standard architecture and demonstrate how it can leverage and align with existing EV charging payment infrastructure already deployed in the market. The objective is to build broader ecosystem and industry support around a scalable authentication and trust framework for in-vehicle commerce.
Jim will additionally help coordinate discussions with merchant ecosystem stakeholders, including groups such as Conexxus, to ensure merchant and acceptance network interests are incorporated into the evolving architecture and standardization approach.
Agenda April 9th, 2026
Kkunal will circulate the onboarding architecture tomorrow. This needs to be finalized before moving to the next step of engaging OEMs.
The API/SDK interface will be used so OEMs can leverage native capabilities (Sri to confirm internally at GM).
Once the API/SDK approach and architecture are finalized, the IVP white paper will be updated.
Steve to prepare a liaison agreement between FIDO and COVESA, focused on biometric authentication. This will support user identification and login for in-vehicle payments (FIDO supports multiple modalities). A key point to determine is which hardware components (e.g. SIM, HSM) will be used for a standardized approach.
Mark to prepare a presentation for COVESA next week covering IVP, the white paper outline, and draft architecture for feedback (11:00–11:15), followed by the panel on Thursday, April 23.
Mark to write to Sri and prepare details for Steve: a short paragraph outlining how COVESA and FIDO will work together, with collaboration scope clearly defined.
Mar 25, 2026
Architecture Review and Confirmation
Porto AMM Planning
Feb 9, 2026
Updated Payment Flow Diagrams
Kkunal presented revised payment flow diagrams.
He will share the updated materials with the group for further review.
AI Demo Flow Including Google Agentic Commerce Protocol
Kkunal will also provide a demo of the AI-driven commerce flow, which incorporates Google’s Agentic Commerce Protocol: https://developers.google.com/merchant/ucp
Focus Area: Agentic Commerce with Voice
The round agreed that agentic commerce—particularly voice‑enabled experiences—will be a primary focus area for introducing payments infrastructure within COVESA.
KYC and Customer–Vehicle Binding
A formal KYC process will need to be defined to ensure that customer registration results in a verified profile that is securely bound to the vehicle.
Existing implementations from OEMs such as Mercedes and BMW may serve as useful reference points for establishing a standardized approach.
Engagement with the AI Workgroup
Once the round reaches consensus on the proposed protocol, we will invite the AI workgroup to review and share insights.
However, the initial assessment indicates limited overlap between their current scope and this group's work.
COVESA Porto Event
The group discussed participation in the upcoming COVESA event in Porto.
A workshop led by Mike has been requested, and organizing one to two panels is under consideration.
Attendee lists are still unclear, but the group aims to ensure representation from this workstream.
Mark is currently unable to travel due to workload, but can join virtually if necessary.
John Moon may be able to lead the discussion here.
Dec 1, 2025
Participants:
Topics:
Benefits of MCC Optimization for In‑Vehicle Payments
Lower Transaction Costs
Current MCC classifications often place EV charging and fleet fueling in higher‑risk categories, driving up interchange fees.
By establishing dedicated MCCs for EV charging, fleet fueling, and car‑present transactions, we can better reflect the true risk profile and reduce costs.
Payment networks typically require several years of transaction history (around four years) before adjusting pricing. A coordinated industry effort can accelerate this process by pooling data across OEMs and merchants.
New Merchant Category Codes (MCCs) for the Automotive Industry
Car‑Present Transactions: Allows the transactions to be authenticated via the proposed COVESA IVP framework for e-commerce transactions, allowing for reduced risk in the transaction
Fleet‑Present Transactions: EV fleets and trucks represent predictable, recurring usage patterns that should be classified as lower risk. They may have higher authentication mechanisms (e.g. fleet driver IDs, authentication apps with the vehicle for higher security for fueling, etc.)
Charging MCC: EV charging should be treated more like a utility transaction, which historically carries lower risk. As a cable is involved, continuous authentication occurs over a more extended period during charging, reducing the risk in non-prepaid cases.
Proximity MCC: Geo-location verification (vehicle is at Costco, charging station, or merchant site) provides strong fraud mitigation and supports lower interchange fees.
Next Steps
Note MCC proposals for new or reclassified categories that include payment networks (Visa, Mastercard, Amex) in follow-up standards paper.
Aggregate historical transaction data across OEMs and merchants to support reclassification (this may need to be card scheme driven).
Update the draft architecture framework with description of each section in paragraph form to explain the technical aspects, in preparation for the follow-up of the COVESA standards paper.
Bring in new merchants and OEMs into the COVESA IVP standards discussion
Ask the COVESA team to formalize agreement with FIDO Alliance, so we can bring Andrew Shikiar (FIDO CEO) into the discussions
Past In-Vehicle Payment (IVP) Workshop Recordings
In-Vehicle Payment SIG Workshop |
|
|
Introduction and Overview Speaker: John Moon- COO at ConnectedTravel and GENIVI IVP/EV SIG Lead Abstract: Welcome everyone, Update on the IVP SIG, Report on related upcoming events | ||
EV and Fuel Transactions Speaker: Will Judge, VP at Mastercard Abstract: Mastercard has been a leader in connected car commerce and has been engaged with the merchant and automotive companies including GM, HERE, Honda, Soundhound, Sonic, and White Castle. Hear about Mastercard’s latest work in connected car and fuel transactions and learn about how they are thinking about EV payments. | ||
Challenges and Opportunities in EV Charging Payments Speakers: Niclas Gyllenram, Director of Software Development at Volvo, and Will Judge VP at Mastercard EV growth will introduce new first-time drivers to electric cars and along with it the task of educating customers on what it means to own an electric car. Paying to charge the car when away from home is becoming a growing complexity for new EV owners compared to the convenience of fueling at a gas station. Join us for a fireside chat with Volvo and Mastercard as they discuss their views on the challenges and opportunities OEMs face with customers paying for EV charging. | No slides for this session | |
Vehicle location-based services (VLBS) at Scale Speaker: Evgeny Klochikhin, CEO at http://Sheeva.AI Abstract: Enabling Location-Based Services for Cars to monetize in-vehicle connectivity – http://Sheeva.AI will present a case study on the first autonomous, cloud-based VLBS solution enabling automatic, contactless payments and last-mile services for EV charging, fueling, road-usage charging, parking, and other critical applications without new physical infrastructure or hardware installed inside connected vehicles. | ||
Challenges for Compliant In-Car Payments in Europe Speaker: Jakob Gajdzik, Product Owner eCommerce Digital Transactions at BMW Abstract: As an OEM, there are a series of questions to consider even before in-car payment can be designed technically. Regulations such as PSD2, authentication methods, available standards, and payment process constraints need to be considered. Join us on our road towards compliant in-car payments. | Video not available | |
Automating Fleet Payments Speaker: Khalid Elawady, Chief Product Officer at CarIQ Abstract: Fleet administrators know that monitoring, verifying, and reconciling payments related to operating a vehicle is a time-consuming necessity. Machine banking allows cars to connect directly with merchants to transact for any type of service and addresses these needs and more. | ||
The EV Charging Ecosystem: Building Out EV Infrastructure
Abstract: OEM's, municipalities, and governments globally are committing to the growth of EVs, leading to the need to rapidly develop and deploy supporting infrastructure to meet the demands of consumers. This new demand presents an opportunity, but also requires, OEMs, suppliers, service providers, and municipalities to collaborate to deploy services to new customers. Our panelist will share their perspective on how they see the ecosystem working together and the challenges they face in this developing market. | No slides for this session |